PDP rejects Edo tribunal judgment, heads to A’Court

The Peoples Democratic Party, has described the judgment of the Edo State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal as a travesty of justice.
The party stated that, after receiving and studying the certified true copy of the judgment, it found the tribunal’s decision to be a miscarriage of justice which allegedly ignored overwhelming facts, twisted the law, and rewarded impunity.
These claims were contained in a statement by the Edo State PDP Chairman, Dr Tony Aziegbemi, on Sunday in Abuja.
Aziegbemi said, “Having received and studied the Certified True Copy of the judgment, the petitioners are now even more convinced that the tribunal turned the law on its head to protect a rigged process.”
According to the party, the tribunal abandoned its constitutional duty to deliver justice and instead constituted itself as a “fourth respondent”, inventing technicalities to sidestep the clear evidence of electoral malpractice placed before it.
“We have studied the CTC of the judgment. This judgment, with due respect to the judges involved, is a travesty.
“But we are not deterred. We are proceeding to the Court of Appeal with the facts, the law, and the will of the Edo people firmly on our side,” Aziegbemi added.
The PDP’s petition accused INEC of rigging the election in favour of the APC by failing to comply with its own guidelines and by collating manipulated results across the state.
According to the petition, the PDP governorship candidate in the 2024 Edo State election, Asue Ighodalo, scored the majority of lawful votes and should have been declared the winner.
Anthony Ehilebo, the Special Adviser on Media to Ighodalo, on his part, said people do not grasp the gravity of what happened in Edo.
He explained, “Tap Initiative uncovered what was effectively an electoral coup. INEC printed a duplicate set of result sheets and used these fake documents to declare their preferred candidate.
“The irony is that the real results are still available to be viewed on INEC’s own IReV portal as we speak! Tap has reported this to the ICPC and called for the prosecution of the officials involved.
“INEC also failed to fill forms essential for guaranteeing the integrity of the elections — a responsibility the Supreme Court has said is a strict liability issue. That is what the tribunal has now endorsed. We are duty-bound to challenge this travesty at the appellate court.”
Meanwhile, the statement noted that the allegations were supported by a forensic audit published by Tap Initiative, which revealed substantial irregularities in INEC’s certified result sheets adding that the report found that many of the results appeared to have been filled in by a single individual, rather than by different presiding officers across polling units.
The statement also said a broad coalition of civil society groups and international observers had echoed these concerns stating that the Athena Centre for Policy and Leadership revealed how INEC’s digital infrastructure was compromised, enabling the manipulation of result uploads.
The statement also said that Yiaga Africa, in its post-election statement, cited “serious lapses in the collation process”. The Foundation for Investigative Journalism went even further, describing the election as having been “rigged for the APC by design.”
The PDP added that these reports appear to have found an audience in the international community as the U.S. Mission in Nigeria in an unusually pointed statement, confirmed it is following the appeal process closely, particularly in light of civil society concerns over the integrity of the vote.
It noted that the Mission emphasised that transparency and due process are essential to democratic legitimacy — a signal, many observers believe, of disapproval of the tribunal’s ruling.